Science It Works Bitches

Month

March 2012

75 posts

Play
Feb 29, 20124 notes

February 2012

62 posts

Feb 29, 20121 note
Feb 29, 2012361 notes
Feb 29, 201297,813 notes
Feb 28, 2012163,363 notes
Feb 28, 2012221 notes
Feb 28, 20121,240 notes
Feb 28, 2012129 notes
Feb 28, 201214,259 notes
Feb 28, 2012
Feb 28, 201236,820 notes
Abortion In Nature → andrewsullivan.thedailybeast.com

letterstomycountry:

Sullivan observes a Discover Magazine article that discusses the “Bruce Effect:”

The trend of aborting babies in the face of strange males is known as the Bruce effect. That’s not a slight against men of that name; the effect is named after the scientist who discovered it – Hilda Margaret Bruce. In 1959, she noticed that pregnant mice will abort if they’re exposed to unfamiliar males. Since then, scientists have found the same effect among other laboratory rodents, and domestic horses. But the Bruce effect has always remained a quirk of captivity. No one really knew if wild animals do the same thing.

A new study found that geladas, a relative of the baboon, do have abortions in the wild:

Normally, the failure rate for gelada pregnancies is around 2 per cent. If a new male arrives, it shoots up to 80 per cent. … But why would a pregnant female abort her own foetus? Roberts thinks that it’s an adaptive tactic in the face of a new male’s murderous tendencies. Since the male would probably kill the newborn baby anyway, it’s less costly for the female to abort than to waste time and energy on bringing a doomed infant to term. Her future offspring, conceived more quickly and fathered by the incumbent king of the hill, will stand a better chance of survival.

Feb 28, 201210 notes
“In just one year, the expenditure of the U.S.’s military budget is equivalent to the entire 50-year running budget of NASA combined.” —Neil deGrasse Tyson (via anticapitalist)
Feb 28, 20121,968 notes
Feb 27, 20125,263 notes
Feb 27, 2012426 notes
Feb 27, 2012341 notes
Feb 27, 20123,245 notes
Dear religious and theistic minded people,

Beliefs do NOT get automatic respect. This seems to be a popular perception amongst the religious and frankly its starting to peeve me. I tend to hear this mostly from Christians, but Muslims too, who believe their religious views are immune to criticism, satire, or mocking simply because they have them. Why I ask? Would you by default respect someone’s racist belief? How about someone’s belief that the world is flat? Beliefs don’t merit automatic respect because some beliefs are immoral, evil, or just plain stupid. All beliefs, all ideas, and all opinions are subject to review and criticism. To NOT do this just forgoes moral and intellectual responsibility. So in conclusion if you want your belief respected…you better be able to justify it. If you’re not able to then you’re nothing but a chowder head.

Sincerely,
Logic.  

Feb 27, 20122 notes
Feb 26, 20127,763 notes
Play
Feb 26, 201281 notes
Feb 25, 20128 notes
Feb 25, 2012791 notes
“Science is an inherent contradiction — systematic wonder — applied to the natural world. In its mundane form, the methodical instinct prevails and the result, an orderly procession of papers, advances the perimeter of knowledge, step by laborious step. Great scientific minds partake of that daily discipline and can also suspend it, yielding to the sheer love of allowing the mental engine to spin free. And then Einstein imagines himself riding a light beam, Kekule formulates the structure of benzene in a dream, and Fleming’s eye travels past the annoying mold on his glassware to the clear ring surrounding it — a lucid halo in a dish otherwise opaque with bacteria — and penicillin is born. Who knows how many scientific revolutions have been missed because their potential inaugurators disregarded the whimsical, the incidental, the inconvenient inside the laboratory?” —

From Systematic Wonder: A Definition of Science That Accounts for Whimsy

via Brain Pickings

(via jtotheizzoe)

Feb 23, 2012191 notes
Feb 23, 2012426 notes
Feb 23, 201294,226 notes
Feb 22, 20121,193 notes
Feb 22, 20126 notes
Play
Feb 22, 20128 notes
Stem cells used to 'heal' heart attack scars

femininescience:

image

Damage caused by a heart attack has been healed using stem cells gathered from the patient’s own heart, according to doctors in the US.

Feb 21, 201295 notes
Play
Feb 21, 201285 notes
Feb 21, 2012613 notes
Feb 18, 20122,375 notes
Feb 18, 20121,533 notes
Feb 18, 2012974 notes
Play
Feb 18, 2012861 notes
Feb 18, 2012480 notes
Play
Feb 18, 2012165 notes
Feb 18, 2012731 notes
Play
Feb 18, 2012130 notes
Feb 18, 20121,001 notes
Play
Feb 18, 2012358 notes
Play
Feb 18, 20123 notes
Feb 18, 2012230 notes
Feb 17, 2012175 notes
Feb 15, 2012277 notes
Feb 15, 201239,409 notes
Feb 14, 201280,155 notes
Feb 14, 201292,712 notes
Feb 14, 20121,668 notes
Feb 14, 201239 notes
Next page →
2012 2013
  • January 44
  • February 45
  • March 117
  • April 84
  • May 67
  • June 64
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
2011 2012 2013
  • January 35
  • February 62
  • March 75
  • April 71
  • May 47
  • June 21
  • July 112
  • August 152
  • September 145
  • October 69
  • November 40
  • December 48
2011 2012
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April 61
  • May 51
  • June 20
  • July 14
  • August 1
  • September 1
  • October
  • November
  • December 8